Xiaomi Redmi 9A vs Samsung Galaxy A04s
VS Xiaomi Redmi 9A Samsung Galaxy A04sHere we compared two budget smartphones: the 6.53-inch Xiaomi Redmi 9A (with MediaTek Helio G25) that was released on June 30 2020 against the Samsung Galaxy A04s which is powered by Exynos 850 and came out 26 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi 9A- Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (439 against 393 nits)
- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
- 60% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (150K versus 94K)
- Modern USB Type-C port
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
- Supports 15W fast charging
- The phone is 2-years and 2-months newer
- Fingerprint scanner
- More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 850
- More recent OS version: Android 12 versus 11
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Redmi 9A 53 Galaxy A04s 66 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Redmi 9A 20 Galaxy A04s 24 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Redmi 9A 70 Galaxy A04s 82 Camera Photo and video recording quality Redmi 9A 41 Galaxy A04s 53 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Redmi 9A 56 Galaxy A04s 69 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Redmi 9A 46 Galaxy A04s 57Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Xiaomi Redmi 9A Price Samsung Galaxy A04s CalculateTests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Redmi 9A vs Galaxy A04sDisplay
Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
Size | 6.53 inches | 6.5 inches |
Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels | 720 x 1600 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
PPI | 269 ppi | 270 ppi |
Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 400 nits |
HDR support | No | No |
Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
Screen-to-body ratio | 81.1% | 80.7% |
RGB color space | 92.9% | 95.1% |
PWM | - | Not detected |
Response time | 40 ms | 20 ms |
Contrast | 1318:1 | 1291:1 |
Design and build
Height | 164.9 mm (6.49 inches) | 164.7 mm (6.48 inches) |
Width | 77 mm (3.03 inches) | 76.7 mm (3.02 inches) |
Thickness | 9 mm (0.35 inches) | 9.1 mm (0.36 inches) |
Weight | 194 gramm (6.84 oz) | 195 gramm (6.88 oz) |
Waterproof | No | No |
Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Colors | Gray Blue Green | White Black Green Orange |
Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes in home button |
Performance
Tests of Xiaomi Redmi 9A and Samsung Galaxy A04s in the benchmarksChipset | MediaTek Helio G25 | Samsung Exynos 850 |
Max. clock | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (8) |
Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.5 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A53 | - 8 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 |
Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 8 nanometers |
Graphics | IMG PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MP1 |
GPU clock | 650 MHz | 820 MHz |
FLOPS | ~41.8 GFLOPS | ~126 GFLOPS |
RAM size | 2 GB | 3 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 32 GB | 32 64 128 GB |
Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Memory card max. size | Up to 256 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Redmi 9A 136 Galaxy A04s +35% 184 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Redmi 9A 473 Galaxy A04s +133% 1100 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Redmi 9A 94090 Galaxy A04s +60% 150900CPU | 36605 | 43206 |
GPU | 12376 | 25138 |
Memory | 24580 | 38540 |
UX | 20429 | 42933 |
Total score | 94090 | 150900 |
PCMark 3.0 score | - | 5734 |
Software
Operating system | Android 10 (Can be upgraded to Android 11) | Android 12 |
ROM | MIUI 12.5 Enhanced | One UI Core 4.1 |
OS size | 11 GB | 12 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Charge power | 10 W | 15 W |
Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | No | No |
Fast charging | No | Yes (28% in 30 min) |
Full charging time | 2:55 hr | 2:14 hr |
Web browsing | - | 12:34 hr |
Watching video | - | 13:10 hr |
Gaming | - | 06:35 hr |
Standby | - | 120 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphonesMatrix | 13 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 8192 x 6144 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | LED | LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | No | No |
1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
Slow motion | No | No |
Lenses | 1 (13 MP) | 3 (50 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 13 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 28 mm - Pixel size: 1 micron - Phase autofocus | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus |
Macro lens | - | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Depth lens | - | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode |
Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Image resolution | 2560 x 1960 | 2560 x 1960 |
Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
Pixel size | 1.12 microns | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth features | LE HID A2DP | LE A2DP |
USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
GPS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS |
NFC* | No | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | 4 | 4 |
5G support | No | No |
Sound
Speakers | Mono | Mono |
Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Yes | No |
Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
Category | Budget | Budget |
Announced | June 2020 | August 2022 |
Release date | August 2020 | September 2022 |
SAR (head) | 0.398 W/kg | 0.52 W/kg |
SAR (body) | 0.901 W/kg | 1.23 W/kg |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint |
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data we think that the Samsung Galaxy A04s is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Xiaomi Redmi 9A 0 (0%) Samsung Galaxy A04s 0 (0%) Vote Total votes: <, 1Related comparisons
1. Xiaomi Redmi 9A or Xiaomi Redmi 9 2. Xiaomi Redmi 9A or Samsung Galaxy A03 Core 3. Xiaomi Redmi 9A or Xiaomi Redmi 10C 4. Xiaomi Redmi 9A or Tecno Spark 8C 5. Samsung Galaxy A04s or Samsung Galaxy A13 6. Samsung Galaxy A04s or Samsung Galaxy A03s 7. Samsung Galaxy A04s or Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022 8. Samsung Galaxy A04s or Samsung Galaxy A04eUser opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Sendsource nanoreview.net
Xiaomi introduced affordable flagships Mi 11X and Mi 11X Pro - powerful
The rise of the 400 smartphone you want how much for a flagship Ars
Xiaomi Verkocht 18 7 Miljoen Telefoons In 2013 - Androidics nl
Xiaomi Launches Online Portal - Investing co uk
Xiaomi
Xiaomi Archives - Techkalauz
Xiaomi was officially removed from US Blacklist TechAlert24
XIAOMI - Quickmobile
Xiaomi Mi 11 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
XIAOMI
Opaska Mi Band 5 - Xiaomi AZE Tech
Huawei Magazine Wallpaper 091 - 1440x2560
Waves Phone Wallpaper 039 - 1080x2340
Fall Phone Wallpaper - 008
Autumn Phone Wallpaper - 062
Cloud Phone Wallpaper 1440x2560 - 014
Apple iPhone X Wallpapers HD