Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Motorola Edge 30
VS
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Motorola Edge 30
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.5-inch Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G) that was released on August 17 2021 against the Motorola Edge 30 which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus and came out 8 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments (1)
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Delivers 26% higher peak brightness (802 against 635 nits)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Waterproof body (IP67 classification)
- Comes with 480 mAh larger battery capacity: 4500 vs 4020 mAh
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 30
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- 10% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (546K versus 498K)
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.1
- The phone is 8-months newer
- Weighs 34 grams less
- 8% faster in single-core GeekBench 5 test: 833 and 773 points
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Galaxy A52s 5G 88 Edge 30 87 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Galaxy A52s 5G 59 Edge 30 66 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Galaxy A52s 5G 76 Edge 30 75 Camera Photo and video recording quality Galaxy A52s 5G 70 Edge 30 73 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Galaxy A52s 5G 84 Edge 30 83 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Galaxy A52s 5G 74 Edge 30 75
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G Price Motorola Edge 30 Calculate
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Galaxy A52s 5G vs Edge 30
Display
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 405 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 800 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 86.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Display tests | RGB color space | 138.1% | 96% |
| PWM | 231 Hz | 250 Hz |
| Response time | 9 ms | 13 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto) Galaxy A52s 5G +26% 802 nits Edge 30 635 nits Sources: NotebookCheck [3] [4]
Design and build
| Height | 159.9 mm (6.3 inches) | 159.38 mm (6.27 inches) |
| Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 inches) | 74.23 mm (2.92 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | 6.79 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 189 gramm (6.67 oz) | 155 gramm (5.47 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP67 | IP52 |
| Rear material | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | White Black Green Purple | Silver Blue Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes in-display | Yes in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio Galaxy A52s 5G 84.9% Edge 30 +2% 86.2%
Performance
Tests of Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and Motorola Edge 30 in the benchmarks
SoC | Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus |
| Max. clock | 2400 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78) - 1 core at 2.5 GHz: Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78) |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Graphics | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| GPU clock | 490 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory | RAM size | 6 8 GB | 6 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage | Storage size | 128 256 GB | 128 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max. size | Up to 1024 GB | - |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Galaxy A52s 5G 773 Edge 30 +8% 833 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Galaxy A52s 5G 2818 Edge 30 +2% 2873 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Galaxy A52s 5G 498345 Edge 30 +10% 546679
| CPU | 151674 | 132596 |
| GPU | 154573 | 175192 |
| Memory | 71728 | 100478 |
| UX | 118916 | 133352 |
| Total score | 498345 | 546679 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance Galaxy A52s 5G 2463 Edge 30 n/a
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2463 | - |
| PCMark 3.0 score | 12009 | - |
Sources: 3DMark [3] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result
Software
| Operating system | Android 11 (Can be upgraded to Android 12) | Android 12 |
| ROM | One UI 4.1 | - |
| OS size | 26 GB | 20 GB |
Battery
Specifications | Capacity | 4500 mAh | 4020 mAh |
| Charge power | 25 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (53% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 22 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:28 hr | 1:04 hr |
Battery life tests | Web browsing | 09:19 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:35 hr | - |
| Gaming | 05:10 hr | - |
| Standby | 110 hr | - |
General battery life Galaxy A52s 5G 31:30 hr Edge 30 n/a
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera | Matrix | 64 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 9000 x 7000 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 123° | 118° |
| Lenses | 4 (64 MP + 12 MP + 5 MP + 5 MP) | 3 (50 MP + 50 MP + 2 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens | - 64 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 0.8 micron - Sensor: 1/1.7" Sony IMX682 (Exmor-RS CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Pixel size: 1 micron - Sensor: 1/1.55" Omnivision OV50A (CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
| Ultra-wide lens | - 12 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Focal length: 13 mm - Pixel size: 1.12 micron | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 0.64 micron - Sensor: 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
| Macro lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - |
| Depth lens | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5.0" (CMOS) | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
Selfie camera | Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6464 x 4864 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 microns | 0.7 microns |
| Sensor type | CMOS | ISOCELL CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/3.14" |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| GPS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
Network | Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test Max. loudness Galaxy A52s 5G 83.6 dB Edge 30 +1% 84.6 dB
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | August 2021 | April 2022 |
| Release date | September 2021 | May 2022 |
| SAR (head) | 0.88 W/kg | - |
| SAR (body) | 0.84 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance and design are more important to you then choose the Motorola Edge 30. But if the software and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 33 (49.3%) Motorola Edge 30 34 (50.7%) Vote Total votes:
67 Related comparisons
1. Samsung Galaxy A13 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 2. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 3. Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 4. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 5. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 6. OnePlus 10 Pro vs Motorola Edge 30 7. Motorola Edge 20 vs Motorola Edge 30 8. OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G vs Motorola Edge 30 9. OnePlus Nord 2T vs Motorola Edge 30 10. Motorola Moto G62 5G vs Motorola Edge 30
User opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
Radu 26 July 2022 01:14 This site has the Motorola edge 30 specs wrong +1 Reply
Sergey 26 July 2022 11:37 Can you give us more details? +5 Reply Name Message Send Send
source nanoreview.net
Android Samsung Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Samsung Refrigerators 4 door with touch screen
Blur Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 111
UnBricking TV by EEPROM Reset - SamyGO
25 amazing Italian bathroom tile designs ideas and pictures 2020
Samsung Galaxy A32 Wallpapers HD
Samsung Wave 723 Hintergrundbilder
2014 Most Beautiful Object in South Africa Design Indaba
